League Vote: Redshirt Rule
The thought process here is to avoid having teams hoard an unreal amount of elite prospects - especially at the QB position - and not being able to just redshirt guys that should be playing immediately. Would make teams be much more judicial about who they decide to sign.
New England Patriots
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs
2010
-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs

-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I voted "No".
New England Patriots
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs
2010
-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs

-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I voted "no" as well. The reality is unless you are a school with a large amount of prestige, then it seems that you can't always control who you sign.Rizzo wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2019 9:56 pmThe thought process here is to avoid having teams hoard an unreal amount of elite prospects - especially at the QB position - and not being able to just redshirt guys that should be playing immediately. Would make teams be much more judicial about who they decide to sign.
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I voted yes, mainly for realism aspect. That and realistically a player being RS shouldn't starter ready.
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
They do have a transfer window for 19, but not nearly as much talent leaves as there needs to be. I don't know if they tweaked that or not. Last season only one 5-star QB transferred. A lot of those players will go pro early so you don't want to red shirt them anyways. For realism I would say keep it but this would bring more parity to the league which is a good thing. I don't know which way to vote. I got to think about it a bit more.
2010 CSFL: 14-2 (playoffs 3-0, Super Bowl Champions)
*Previous GM 3-2
2011 CSFL: 14-2 (playoffs 2-1, lost in Super Bowl)
2012 CSFL: 16-0 (playoffs 1-1, lost in NFC Championship)
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I voted yes. There's over 100 teams so there's parity built in. So how else can you build a dynasty than to retain and raise talent to fit championship windows. I say at first we should go for realism and learn from year 1.
Tennessee Titans
2010 CSFL: 9-7
2011 CSFL: 13-3 (Super Bowl II Champion, MVP: V. Young)
2011 CSFL: 13-3 (Super Bowl II Champion, MVP: V. Young)
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I voted yes for realism and the fact that there is more transferring than it appears 19 had. I've played about 15 season so far in the BETA and I have players transferring all the time to mid-tier schools because I promised playing time and ended up sitting them on the bench or red shirting them. Or I just must be really bad at the game and the AI is learning not to sign with my school...
Re: League Vote: Redshirt Rule
I haven’t had time to play test it but if transfers are much more prevalent then I would be ok with allowing 5* redshirts.
New England Patriots
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs
2010
-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl
2011: 8-8, Missed Playoffs
2010: 14-2, Lost in Super Bowl I
AFC Champs

-----
Washington Huskies
2010: 12-4, PAC-12 North Division Champs
Texas Longhorns
2011: 7-6, won Liberty Bowl